Controversy surrounding Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s documentary with Netflix has taken a new twist, as Australian television hosts David Koch and Natalie Barr have raised questions about the authenticity of one of the homes featured in the series. Harry and Meghan, who signed a multi-million dollar deal with Netflix in 2020, opened up their private lives to viewers in the docuseries titled Harry & Meghan. The series showcases behind-the-scenes footage, intimate interviews, and glimpses into the couple’s personal life.

One particular element of the documentary has drawn scrutiny: the impressive California mansion featured in several scenes. Viewers are led to believe that this mansion is Harry and Meghan’s personal family home. However, according to Sunrise hosts Koch and Barr, this might not be the case.

During their morning show, the Australian hosts revealed that they had done some investigating into the mansion’s ownership. To the surprise of many, they discovered that the property does not, in fact, belong to Harry or Meghan. Instead, public records show that the luxurious estate is owned by a wealthy businessman in the area. This revelation has cast doubt on the authenticity of the portrayal of Harry and Meghan’s living situation in the Netflix series.

The hosts called into question the representation of the mansion as the couple’s private residence, suggesting that the public may have been misled. “It looks like Harry and Meghan were not as upfront as we thought,” Koch remarked. Barr added, “It’s disappointing if they’re trying to pass off someone else’s home as their own.”

This revelation has caused quite a stir, with many fans of the couple expressing confusion and disappointment. Some have defended Harry and Meghan, arguing that using a stand-in property for filming might have been a necessary privacy measure. However, critics argue that the couple, known for their desire for transparency and authenticity, should have been clearer about the details surrounding the mansion featured in the documentary.

The debate touches on broader issues of celebrity image management and the blurred line between public and private life. For a couple who have repeatedly spoken out against media intrusion, the use of a rented or borrowed property could seem contradictory to their public stance on privacy and honesty. As this latest controversy unfolds, it raises questions about how much of the documentary is genuinely reflective of Harry and Meghan’s day-to-day lives.

While Harry and Meghan have not yet addressed these claims, the controversy has already sparked discussions about truth in celebrity storytelling and the role of documentary filmmaking in shaping public perception. For now, the debate rages on, with some viewers feeling misled, while others continue to support the couple and their right to protect their privacy—even if it means using a mansion they don’t actually own for the cameras.

This revelation may be just another chapter in the ongoing saga of Harry and Meghan’s life in the public eye, where every detail, real or perceived, is subject to scrutiny.