In a surprising turn of events,, also known as the Harkles, have taken down their Netflix documentary from the Archewell Productions website.

The six-part mockumentary, which mocked traditional royal protocols, was removed amidst ongoing legal proceedings involving Samantha Markle, Meghan’s half-sister.

It is interesting to note that despite their attempts to hide their involvement, the Harkles’ production company, Archewell, is still credited in the documentary.

This raises questions about their true feelings towards their own love story and whether they are as proud of it as they previously claimed.

Furthermore, the audio version of the documentary, titled “Archetypes,” has mysteriously disappeared from the Archewell website, although it remains available on Spotify.

This suggests that Meghan may not be proud of this aspect of her past either.

Surprisingly, according to their website, the Harkles have seemingly done nothing noteworthy in the last four years, except for Harry’s involvement with Invictus Netflix.

According to a close source, Megan’s panicked actions to remove the documentary are likely connected to Samantha’s lawsuit.

Samantha’s lawyer argues that Meghan and Harry, as the producers of the documentary, are responsible for every word that was said, making them liable for defamation.

This assertion greatly strengthens Samantha’s defamation claims against them.

Although the documentary is still available on Netflix, it seems that Megan’s efforts to delete any incriminating evidence have caused her and her supporters to start deleting and hiding various content.

This behavior suggests an awareness of guilt and further supports Samantha’s claims.

Currently, Megan’s attorneys are seeking to have the lawsuit dismissed, claiming it lacks merit.

In her lawsuit, Samantha Markle accuses her half-sister of making false and reckless statements that have damaged her reputation and disrupted her peaceful life.

Samantha alleges that she has received death threats and faced community scrutiny as a result.

Samantha points to Meghan’s denial of their relationship during the interview as evidence of false statements.

She claims that she and Meghan had a good relationship until Meghan met Harry and cut off all communication.

Additionally, Samantha highlights a Netflix series where it was implied that she, along with others, launched an attack campaign against Meghan on Twitter, resulting in her account suspension.

Samantha vehemently denies any involvement in such a campaign and hopes that this lawsuit will expose Meghan’s attempts to tarnish her reputation.

In response, Megan’s lawyer argues that Samantha’s claims do not meet the threshold for defamation.

They suggest that Samantha is simply objecting to Megan’s recollection of their childhood together.

As the legal battle continues, it remains to be seen how this lawsuit will unfold and whether it will shed light on the complex dynamics within the Markle family.

People change, and personal agendas often come into play, but the truth remains steadfast, as Samantha Markle aptly stated.