In a scathing critique following the alarming attempt on former President Donald Trump’s life, Dan Bongino, a former Secret Service agent turned commentator, didn’t mince words. Speaking passionately in a recent YouTube interview, Bongino lambasted the Secret Service for what he described as a catastrophic security failure.

“Saturday was a complete breakdown,” Bongino declared, his frustration palpable. “There were so many lapses, it’s hard to know where to begin.”

Bongino, drawing on his own experience within the Secret Service, highlighted glaring oversights that he believes should have been avoided. “Why was there no spotter? Why wasn’t there a post-stander? And why, knowing about the threat for a significant period beforehand, was President Trump allowed on stage?” These questions, he argued, demand urgent answers.

Reflecting on his past roles, Bongino emphasized the fundamental protocols that, in his view, were shockingly disregarded. “When there’s an active threat, you don’t gamble with safety. You mitigate risks,” he asserted. Drawing a sharp contrast, he noted instances from his tenure where proactive measures were swiftly implemented to safeguard public figures.

The failures, according to Bongino, extend beyond mere procedural errors. He criticized the current Secret Service leadership, labeling their explanations as inadequate and misguided. “The excuse about the roof’s slope preventing a sniper team? Absurd,” he scoffed. “They had options, and they chose poorly.”

As speculation swirls about the incident, including unfounded rumors of insider involvement, Bongino remained cautious. “Opinions are plentiful, but evidence is what matters,” he cautioned, refraining from endorsing unsubstantiated theories. However, his skepticism towards investigative agencies’ transparency remains unabated.

When questioned about his potential role as the next FBI director, Bongino’s response was measured yet contemplative. “I never envisioned returning to government service, but duty sometimes outweighs personal plans,” he admitted, hinting at a willingness contingent on specific conditions.

In conclusion, Bongino’s impassioned critique underscores a broader call for accountability and reform within the security apparatus. With implications reverberating across political and security landscapes, the fallout from this incident promises to be far-reaching.

As investigations unfold, scrutiny intensifies, and public figures and agencies alike brace for the fallout, Bongino’s voice stands as a clarion call for stringent safeguards and steadfast vigilance in protecting those under threat.