Caitlin Clark’s Indiana Fever have struggled out of the gate, managing only 2 wins in 11 games played while the Connecticut Sun are dominating the East and have gone undefeated through 9 games.

Those 9 losses have certainly not been the fault of superstar Caitlin Clark who is averaging 15.6 points/game, 5.1 rebounds, and 6.4 assists.

With numbers like that she’s had an immediate impact on the Indiana Fever but evidently it wasn’t enough to crack the top 5 of ESPN’s WNBA Rookie rankings where Cameron Brink came in at #1 overall followed by Angel Reese at #2.

The rankings go:

    Cameroп Briпk
    Aпgel Reese
    Kate Martiп
    Rickea Jacksoп
    Jυlie Vaпloo
    Caitliп Clark
    Aaliyah Edwards
    Sevgi Uzυп
    Leoпie Fiebich

In a surprising turn of events, Brittney Griner, a prominent figure in the WNBA, has stirred controversy with her recent remarks about rookie Caitlin Clark. Griner’s comments, perceived by many as sarcastic, suggested that Clark was merely a “commercial contract” without sufficient skills to back up her status. This has ignited a fierce backlash among fans and widespread media coverage.

Griner’s statement came in the wake of not being listed among the top five best rookies in the WNBA, a snub that evidently fueled her critical comments. She downplayed Clark’s abilities, insinuating that her prominence was more about marketing than actual talent.

This critique did not sit well with many in the basketball community, especially Clark’s supporters. The reaction from fans has been swift and intense, with many taking to social media to express their outrage.

Supporters of Clark argue that her performance on the court speaks for itself, highlighting her achievements and skills. The dispute has led to a broader conversation about the evaluation of talent and the role of commercial interests in sports.

Griner’s remarks have also sparked discussions among sports analysts and commentators. Some believe that her comments were a result of frustration and competitiveness, while others view them as an unwarranted attack on a young player’s potential.

Regardless of the motive, the incident underscores the passionate nature of basketball fandom and the high stakes involved in professional sports.

As the debate continues to unfold, both Griner and Clark remain under the spotlight. The incident serves as a reminder of the powerful influence of words in the sports world and the importance of recognizing and respecting emerging talent.

In the coming weeks, it will be interesting to see how both players respond to the controversy and how it might impact their performances and public perceptions moving forward. For now, the basketball community watches closely, awaiting the next chapter in this unfolding drama.