In a recent video from Indiana, Coach Cheryl Reeve explained why she didn’t choose Caitlin Clark. Her reason was straightforward: “I’ve never been in the trenches with her.” Essentially, Reeve said that she hasn’t had the chance to coach Clark, doesn’t know her well, and isn’t sure what Clark stands for or how she’d perform under pressure.

Many people were expecting a different explanation, such as Clark needing rest due to playing a lot of games, which would have been more understandable. Instead, Reeve’s reason—that she hasn’t had the opportunity to see Clark in action up close—left fans disappointed. They believe Clark should have been given the chance to prove herself.

Reeve’s explanation didn’t sit well with many, who feel that if fatigue or another logical reason had been given, it would have been more acceptable. The decision based on unfamiliarity is seen as a weak excuse, especially when many were looking forward to seeing Caitlin Clark play in the Olympics.

The controversy has sparked significant upset among fans, who argue that Clark’s absence will affect their interest in watching the USA Women’s National Team in the Olympics. They believe she deserved a chance to demonstrate her abilities on such a prestigious platform.